Sets are one of the most fundamental concepts in AMPL. They are used to index variables, constraints, parameters and sometimes other sets. Most expressions involve an operation being performed over a set. Sets allow for large mathematical programmes to be expressed concisely.
set
keyword followed by a label, possibly some attributes and either a set literal or set expression. The most common attribute is set by the within
keyword. This specifies that the set will only contain elements from the following set definition: set ARCS within NODES cross NODES; # Elements of ARCS must have both elements in NODESIf you need a multi-dimensional set, but don't have the 1-dimensional sets to construct it yet you can use the
dimen
keyword: set ROUTES dimen 2;There are some other set attributes, but we will not use them.
Set literals can be defined as a list of elements:
{'HOST', 'DEVICE', 'SWITCH', 'HUB', 'LINK', 'SUPERLINK'}or a sequence of numbers:
param start; param end > start; param step; set NUMBERS := start .. end by step;If the
by step
is missing, the step is assumed to be 1 set NUMBERS := 1..5; # NUMBERS = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}Note Automatic set generation can only be done in the model environment, in the data environment you must define the set explicitly:
set NUMBERS := 1 2 3 4 5; # NUMBERS = {1, 2, 3, 4 5}
s in SUPPLY_NODES
, before the colon :
operator;
:
) to indicate if an element (or pair of elements, or “tuple” of elements) should be included in the set.
Generic Set Expression
{ <e> in <S>, [<f> in <T>, <g> in <U>, …] : <logical expression involving e [f, g, …]>}
Set expressions may also involve one or more set operators:
A union B
gives the set of elements in either A
or B
;
A inter B
gives the set of elements in both A
and B
;
A diff B
gives the set of elements in A
that are not in B
;
A symdiff B
gives the set of elements in either A
or B
but not both;
A cross B
gives the two-dimensional set of all pairs a
A
, b
B
. This can also be defined by {a in A, b in B}
.
You will see examples of set expressions throughout the rest of this page.
Sets are usually defined in a data file:
set NODES := Youngstown Pittsburgh Cincinnati 'Kansas City' Chicago Albany Houston Tempe Gary ;
although they may be defined during declaration using either an explicit set literal or using a set expression:
set KIND := {'HOST', 'DEVICE', 'SWITCH', 'HUB', 'LINK', 'SUPERLINK'}; set COMPONENT := {C in CLASSES : (kind[C] = 'HOST' ) or (kind[C] = 'DEVICE') or (kind[C] = 'HUB' ) or (kind[C] = 'SWITCH')}; set FABRIC := NODE union LINK;
and sets may also be defined dynamically:
set SEARCH within VERTICES; let SEARCH := {v in VERTICES: (v, w) in EDGES};
There are three different ways to define 2-dimensional sets. The "best" way to use depends on the set.
model; set ARCS within NODES cros NODES; data; set ARCS := (Youngstown, Albany), (Youngstown, Cincinnati), ... ;
+
where an element exists and a -
where there is no element. This is good for dense sets.
set ARCS: Cincinnati ‘Kansas City’ Chicago Albany Houston Tempe Gary := Youngstown + + + + - - - Pittsburgh + + + - - - + Cincinnati - - - + + - - ‘Kansas City’ - - - - + + - Chicago - - - - - + + ;
set ARCS := (Youngstown, *) Cincinnati ‘Kansas City’ Chicago Albany (Pittsburgh, *) Cincinnati ‘Kansas City’ Chicago Gary (Cincinnati, *) Albany Houston ...
You can create sets where the elements are ordered using the ordered
keyword during definition.
Up to here - Mike
set MONTHS ordered;AMPL will puts the elements in this set in the order they appear in the data file (or {\tt let} statement). AMPL also understands the following operations for ordered sets:
ord(e, ORD_SET) # The position of e in ORD_SET first(ORD_SET) # The first element in ORD_SET last(ORD_SET) # The last element in ORD_SET prev(e, ORD_SET) # The element before e in ORD_SET next(e, ORD_SET) # The element after e in ORD_SET member(i, ORDSET) # The element at position i in ORD_SET
Consider the following AMPL statement from the The American Steel Planning Problem. We use ord
in the creation of TIME_ARCS
:
# The set of time-staged arcs set TIME_ARCS within TIME_NODES cross TIME_NODES := { (m, t) in TIME_NODES, (n, u) in TIME_NODES : ( ( (m, n) in ARCS) and (t = u) ) or # The arcs used for transportation ( (m = n) and (ord(t, MONTHS) + 1 = ord(u, MONTHS)) )}; # The arcs used for storageThere are many concepts within this one statement, let's look at them one at a time.
cross
creates all pairs of two sets, so TIME_NODES cross TIME_NODES
creates a set of all pairs of TIME_NODES
. Some set operations may be looped over indexing sets. For example, to generate all the transportation arcs in the time-staged network you could use the following statement
set TRANSPORT_ARCS := union {t in MONTHS} (union {(m, n) ARCS} {(m, t, n, t)});or you could loop over {\tt MONTHS} and {\tt ARCS} simultaneously
set TRANSPORT_ARCS := union {t in MONTHS, (m, n) in ARCS} {(m, t, n, t)};
in
keyword. This keyword also provides a logical check if an element is in a set, e.g., (m, n) in ARCS
is true if the pair (m, n)
is in the set ARCS
and false otherwise. We may restrict a set to be a subset of an existing set by using the keyword {\tt within}, e. g., set ARCS within NODES cross NODES;means each arc is created between two nodes.
TIME_ARCS
( (m = n) and (ord(t, MONTHS) + 1 = ord(u, MONTHS)) )};creates the "storage" arcs. We could use next(t, MONTHS) = u or t = prev(u, MONTHS) except for a problem when
t
is June
or u
is April
, respectively. When you use prev
or next
you must be careful of the first and last members of the set respectively. However, you can use first
or last
to check if you are using these elements.
display {(m, n) in ARCS : Supply[m] > 0}; # Display all arcs from supply nodesWe can do this when creating sets, e. g.,
TIME_NODES
, or when using a set as an index for variables, parameters or constraints. For example, rather than setting the upper bound of UnderProduction
to be 0 for all non-supply nodes (since non-supply nodes don't produce anything) we could only create this variable for the supply nodes (in fact this may be preferable since there will be less variables). var UnderProduction {(n, t) in TIME_NODES : Supply[n, t] > 0} >= 0, integer;We could make sure this variable is only added to the constraints for the supply nodes (e.g.,
ConserveFlow
constraints) by using a conditional expression. subject to ConserveFlow {(n, t) in TIME_NODES}: sum {(m, s) in TIME_NODES: (m, s, n, t) in TIME_ARCS} Shipment[m, s, n, t] + Supply[n, t] - if Supply[n, t] > 0 then UnderProduction[n, t] = ...
TIME_ARCS
has 4 dimensions. We generated TIME_ARCS
automatically, but we could have specified it using a data file. set TIME_ARCS within TIME_NODES cross TIME_NODES;List
set TIME_ARCS := (Youngstown, April, Albany, April) (Youngstown, April, Youngstown, May) ... ;Table
set TIME_ARCS : = (*, May, *, May) Cincinnati 'Kansas City' Albany ... := Youngstown + + + ... Pittsburgh + + - ... ... ;Array
set TIME_ARCS := (*, May, *, May) (Youngstown, Cincinnati) ... ... ;or
set TIME_ARCS := (Youngstown, May, *, May) Cincinnati ‘Kansas City’ ... ... ;
TIME_ARCS
statement) can take a long time if there are many possibilities. This is time that could be spent solving the model! If possible you should try to create sets by building them up from smaller building block, rather than by creating an enormous set and pruning it. For example, instead of using this statement # The set of time-staged arcs set TIME_ARCS within TIME_NODES cross TIME_NODES := { (m, t) in TIME_NODES, (n, u) in TIME_NODES : ( ( (m, n) in ARCS) and (t = u) ) or # The arcs used for transportation ( (m = n) and (ord(t, MONTHS) + 1 = ord(u, MONTHS)) )}; # The arcs used for storageto create
TIME_ARCS
you could use these statement set TRANSPORT_ARCS := union {t in MONTHS, (m, n) in ARCS} {(m, t, n, t)}; set STORAGE_ARCS := union {t in MONTHS, (m, n) in ARCS : t <> last(MONTHS)} {(m, t, n, next(t, MONTHS)}; set TIME_ARCS within TIME_NODES cross TIME_NODES := TRANSPORT_ARCS union STORAGE_ARCS;Rather than looping over all possibilities and only keeping those that are appropriate, the new statement only loops over smaller sets that can be used to build up the
TIME_NODES
set efficiently. -- MichaelOSullivan - 27 Feb 2008